Your points here are better, but again the argument isn't sound in relation to these particular points. Okay, At-At. It's easy to explain it as having some anti-gravity generator that counter balances it or some crap (I'm not quite sure what you mean by it wouldn't work, it sure looks like it would be just fine. Anything quadrupedal is surely not hard to balance). Star Trek again, they have made-up technology to explain every detail of what happens, that's great! We have no real world counterpart so it's PURE fantasy. What we have here is guns, things that people can see and use every day, that require bullets to make 90 degree turns within the gun, in order for the bullet to escape. You can make a gun in destiny with bullets that can turn corners and I'm fine with that, that is fantasy as we have no real world comparison. What we have here is weapons modelled very well on real world things, but with massive obvious and unnecessary impossibilities. The big thing about me agreeing or disagreeing with people here is whether a feature ADDS or DETRACTS from the fantasy... Star Trek, food from the replicators, so food from energy. Oh look, we have near unlimited energy from the warp core, sweet. There's a scene in Star Gate where a team is in a ship heading for a crash landing on a planet, an ally opens a hyperspace window [i]through[/i] the planet (just a short window), that's fine, pure fantasy. What we have with these guns is in effect the ship plowing straight through the planet and everything being fine.