{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/25/2015 8:08:52 AM
2
Try clicking the links and educating yourself about the Chiapa Rhino, it can be fired just like The Last Word just fine.
English
-
Perhaps you should try educating [i]yourself[/i] before attempting to make others look stupid. The hammer on the Rhino is false. It does not fire the weapon. It indicates that the cylinder has turned. Nothing more. You cannot, in fact, fire a Rhino the same as The Last Word. The fact that the hammers on Destiny's hand cannons are shown within the game to be functional is proof that the guns are no the same as the Rhino. Unlike you, I am not actually "ignorant to the world of firearms".
-
Edited by NegativeCycle: 5/25/2015 2:37:50 PMYou apparently are ignorant to how they work as the hammer is not at all false as it does in fact cock and strike the chambered round. http://i.imgur.com/2Uwl4dq.jpg I love when idiots try to act like they know something and then get bitch slapped back to reality.
-
Like you? Your assertions are debunked in the very same video that you linked. Which is proof that you never even bothered to watch it. Your problem is arrogance. You're full of yourself... and you like to announce yourself the winner before the game is over. That's a fault you might want to work on. Checkmate.
-
You apparently are too stupid to understand that you can fire it by manually pulling the trigger or cocking the hammer just like any other revolver stop illustrating how goddamn ignorant you are.
-
Edited by JustOnePepsi: 5/25/2015 3:00:47 PMVideo: Note how the hammer completes a single motion when cocking the firearm. It does not strike the round. It is a manual cocker. Plain and simple. It's a FALSE hammer. The hammer on the hand cannons in Destiny is not false, as evidenced by the obviously double-action animation on them (or single-action, in the case of The Last Word). [quote]as it does in fact cock and strike the chambered round.[/quote] So you're just going to ignore your own words and keep insisting I'm the stupid one? Haha, okay. You're wrong. Deal with it, bro. The hammer on the Rhino is a manual cocker. It does not fire the weapon. Period. End of story. To say otherwise is patently false. You lose. Good day, sir.
-
The Rhinos barrel is low to reduce muzzle climb. I'd say all the hand cannons look like the Rhino.
-
Yes. And that has nothing to do with the parts being misaligned, which would render the weapon inert. That and the hammer functionality shown in Destiny does not match the Rhino. The fact that they were obviously designed with the Rhino in mind doesn't change the fact that they're mechanically wrong.
-
Explain how the Fallen weapons function. They've got directed energy weapons ALL WRONG. The magnetic containment field along the barrel is...... Its thousands of years in the future. There are space pirates and artificial intelligence. I'm pretty sure that your laws of nature no longer apply.
-
The fact that Halo contained plasma weapons had no bearing on whether or not the human weapons were realistically designed. You can't excuse illogical design just because the medium contains examples of even more illogical things. Especially when the design in question is directly based on a real-world counterpart.
-
It does, actually. You're trying to understand something that you've never seen or experienced before. You're taking a preexisting design and assuming its the same. It is obviously not. The wheel gun of yesterday fired actual ammunition. If this were anything like a normal revolver, you could open the wheel and replace expended ammunition. Instead, you replace the whole wheel. The Destiny Hand Cannon does not have ammunition, instead firing some sort of energy projection...it appears anyway.
-
I HAVE seen or experienced it before because it's DIRECTLY based on existing designs. I can't claim that Ice Breaker or the Vex Mythoclast are mechanically inaccurate because there is no real-world counterpart for these things. Changing the ammo used in a weapon doesn't change the mechanics of it when the mechanics are obviously directly based on an existing design. The weapon is meant to function the same as a modern revolver, so it should be comparable to a modern reolver, regardless of what it shoots.
-
Go away, troll.
-
Good one. Really puts a spotlight on your argument. You've given me much to think about. You might even change my opinion. All with just 3 words. Truly a master debater, you.
-
Jet fuel can't melt misplaced hammers.
-
Counter comeback. Murica
-
He doesn't get it. Most of the hand cannons are designed after the Rhino style. If you even go into the manuals for the Rhino's. Your guardian is using the proper grip method for that style of gun as well.
-
Design and functionality are not mutually inclusive.
-
[quote]Design and functionality are not mutually inclusive.[/quote] You mean "mutually exclusive", dimwit. Something that is inclusive is, by definition, "mutual" & vice-versa. God, you really are ignorant, aren't you?
-
Lol learn English
-
Edited by JustOnePepsi: 5/25/2015 10:09:52 AMNo, I mean mutually inclusive. Mutually exclusive implies never related and mutually inclusive implies always related. The term "not" before either of these means neither. Meaning form and function are two separate concepts that are not related to each other 100% of the time. If I'm ignorant, you're obtuse.
-
Damn this man winning
