[quote]Variety and adaptation equals evolution. If the only thing we had to support it was what we've recorded in recent history then yes, I would agree that it still has a huge hole in it. But the fossil record directly supports evolution and what we have observed as well. You will need to make the fossil record disappear or magically change to disprove evolution.
[/quote]
The fossil record only supports more speculation. Carbon 14 dating is out dated and gives highly questionable results. Newly created volcanic glass of recent years dates has been shown to date it several hundred thousand years. When the cumulative error of a series of tests to produce a result has an uncertainty greater than 100%, take the results with a grain of salt.
[quote]
Your taking aspects of evolution, saying its not evolution and then claiming it supports creation. Which is a bunch of crap.[/quote]
The theory of Evolution may include serial adaptations but adaptation unto itself is not necessarily evolution, nor does it support evolution anymore so than creation.
Saying evolution is adaptation and vice versa is as ignorant and incorrect as saying all scotch whiskey is whiskey and that all whiskey is scotch whiskey. Evolution is a concept derived from observed adaptation, not the other way around (like with laws and theories). With regards to Creation, Adaptation is a concept derived from Creation.
English
-
Well damn, first person I've seen stick it to Britton. Just an observer not giving a side but that definitely challenged him more than most posts lol
-
Adaptation is a concept derived from observation. Not creation.