Evolutionary scientists wouldn't be predicting things for the moon landing. Those people are called astrophysicists. So your point is because the lunar surface didn't line up with predictions by astrophysicists, that evolutionary evidence based on observation of fossils, DNA and genetics, etc by different scientists in different fields of study is somehow discredited? The whole point of your excerpt is that it attempts to discredit evolution based on an incorrect prediction by scientists in a separate field of study. Evolution isn't a prediction. Its a conclusion based on observation and experimentation.