{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Britton:
5/7/2015 4:51:38 AM
1
Correct. And since only a small fraction of the suns energy output is absorbed by earth, the net entropy still increases, which is in line with the laws of thermodynamics. That small fraction that earth does absorb is still enough for life.
English
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/7/2015 2:55:51 PMSo, you are implying that "sunlight/radiation on rock makes life?"
-
Yes. Or actually life started in the sea. I mean actually primitive prokaryotes are not something we're entirely sure of and might not have undergone photosynthesis, but might have. The first primitive plants on land would have grown on rocks if they're the prehistoric-day equivalent of mosses, and the rest would've grown in the soil because of the fact that the organic chemicals deposited on earth by supernovae coalesced and reacted to form new chemicals and over thousands of years, those chemicals formed internal systems that made life which evolved to eventually form us.
-
If that's what you got out of what I said, then its not surprising you can't grasp basic concepts.
-
Then do pray tell.
-
Its pointless to explain something you won't understand.
-
Your right. I guess the world will never understand origins.
-
To say because we don't know something now, it can't be known, is the most foolish thing you can assume.
-
same thing can be said about God...
-
Sure, we don't know about god. But since there is 0 evidence for god, we don't need to consider it. Just like there is 0 evidence for dinosaurs on the moon.
-
Agreed.
-
Same thing Can be said about God -_-
-
Yet that's what you just implied. The way you constantly contradict yourself tells me you're just trolling.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/8/2015 6:38:38 AMDisagree, and when I was agreeing, I meant it in a way in which if I said it, it would be against you and understandably in favor of my case.
-
But you have no case. You haven't made a point I can't accurately refute [u]regarding evolution[/u] [spoiler]because origins isn't regarding evolution.[/spoiler]
-
[quote]You haven't made a point I can't accurately refute regarding evolution.[/quote]Please repeat.
