JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: Evolution is a fact, but...
5/6/2015 2:21:03 PM
3
Yes but when you have billions of years of shaking then it fits together eventually
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You don't have billions of years only millions.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by SSG ACM: 5/7/2015 10:42:50 PM
    Can you not also shake things apart, and is not easier to shake things out of order than in to place? The Second Law of Thermodynamics dictates that anything left to itself is left to entropy, chaos, disorder, etc. Not only is this application applicable in Physics but also in societies. The analogy made it a point that the possibility is there, but the chances are so minuet that it is basically impossible.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Exactly you are correct. This continues the analogy. Randomly something can come in to being such as life itself and eventually it will be destroyed by randomness. The watch will stay together for some time before it is shaken apart.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by SSG ACM: 5/7/2015 10:43:23 PM
    Not if in the first place the components of the watch are already apart. Just a thought.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Start shaking and document it. Prove it, and I'll change. Otherwise, I'll believe the more logical answer. Because sometimes the answer isn't the most complex answer. Its the simplest one, especially when the Ultimate Authority tells us the answer.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote] I'll believe the more logical answer. Because sometimes the answer isn't the most complex answer.[/quote]the simplest answer isnt always the most logical though.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • How so? How do you suppose we came into being? According to the faith of evolution?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Donkey_Hotay: 5/6/2015 10:29:58 PM
    [quote]the faith of evolution?[/quote]evolution isnt about faith. evolution is about evidence and observable events. it takes zero faith to support evolution. are you talking about humans or life in general? evolution tells us that in some point in history, humans and apes shared a common ancestor from which we evolved

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by SSG ACM: 5/7/2015 3:14:05 PM
    Then what is the origin of humans? Apes? And Apes? An ancient amoeba? Then what is the origin of that amoeba? Earth? Wait a sec. Earth is non-organic. So how does an inorganic material manifest an organic one. Yes, it is a faith, the belief in something not seen.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [url=http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2015/03/researchers-may-have-solved-origin-life-conundrum]inorganic to organic is not new stuff[/url]

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • "...May Have Solved..." This article isn't even conclusive, and they only mentioned what everyone was already expecting: "Somehow molecules possessing the necessary ingredients for creating lipids, amino acids, nucleus acids, proteins..." We already know those exist and apparently those existed in order for them to create more finite ingredients. This is only a speculated article.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • No, its an article about actual experiments conducted that indicate what the article talks about. The scientific paper is linked in the article.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Sometimes. I'd have to go ahead and say that its pretty logical that something made everything that wasn't just mere coincidence.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • thats actually entirely illogical, but nothing i say can convince you otherwise, so it doesnt matter.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Then have a nice day sir.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon