Excellent. All your counters to evolution are from the bible or other texts which not only predate its discovery, [b]they don't even directly address it[/b]. You're effectively saying that because people didnt know about evolution before it was discovered, it somehow is wrong. That's simply moronic. So you still haven't provided an actual counter to modern scientific information. Once again, for the millionth time, origins of the first life has 0, that's right, [b][i][u]0[/u][/i][/b] to do with evolution. Why you continuously insist that not having an answer yet gives any credit to an alternative explanation with 0 evidence, is beyond me. My belief on Abiogenesis is that it obviously happened, but what caused it is unknown. This position takes 0 faith or belief due to the fact I'm not supporting any answer because one hasn't been 100% found yet. Abiogenesis not having an answer does not affect evolution. Again. [b] Abiogenesis not having an answer does not affect evolution. [/b] One last time, since you still don't understand. [b][u] Abiogenesis not having an answer does not affect evolution. [/u][/b]