This is a great example of how evolution is flawed, but evolutionists will always try to justify it.
Liken it to a trial, if the plaintiff and defendant have two versions of the story, and they contradict each other, it most likely will turn out that one of them is speaking the truth, the other a lie.
We (the jury, if you will) have to determine which is wrong by looking at the facts, or the facts that are most contradicted by the story of either one.
So go on.
Choose
English
-
Except that only one side has an actual story with facts to back it up. The other side only tries to poke holes in their opponents' story without any attempt to back up their own.
-
I am not trying........ To poke holes in yours. There is no way to scientifically prove Christianity is real........ But neither can you prove Macroevoloution is real scientifically
-
Macro evolution and micro evolution are the same exact thing.
-
Yes, you can.
-
Then what, as you are part of the jury, have you decided?