JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

5/5/2015 3:27:03 PM
13
Any rational thinking being would come to the conclusion that thorn is OP. The only fact that almost everyone in IB used it shows that. I don't understand how anyone - fan of thorn or not - can say this gun is not overpowered.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Because it isn't. The gun is just [i]annoying[/i], but it is [i]easily [/i] countered. You just need to accept that you have to [i]adapt[/i] your fighting style to deal with it. You have to be patient, and you have to fight from [i]COVER.[/i] After that, the weapon is no more difficult to deal with than any other.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You don't have to tell me how to counter it. I do fine in crucible. I'm not saying this for myself, in a subjective manner. I'm saying this as objective as I can possibly be. Looking at it from more than one perspective is essential. Whenever I play with Thorn - and I rarely do because it doesn't satisfy me - I just start laughing a bit and constantly thinking "haha, this gun is so OP...". How is it not enough for you that every single team in IB is a full thorn team? How does that in any way implicate a balanced system where all guns are viable in the right hands. Because even if thorn is not OP in terms of damage, it is still OP if every hand is the right hand for this gun. There should be no such thing in a first person shooter. But hey, that is my opinion. Now I want to ask you a question. Do you use Thorn?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Because---now that ARs have been needed into non-competitiveness, and shotguns have had their ammo severely restricted--people aren't stupid. They're are NOT going to stick with weapons that are now a handicap. They WILL move to the NEXT most competitive weapon in the close-to-midrange combat that The Crucible maps foster. Thorn is powerful and one of the best, most balanced performing weapons in the game right now, since ARs have been wiped from the field and pulse rifles are not reliable at close range. Thorn is the same weapon (ignoring the subtle range nerfing) that it has been since December. It didn't magically become OP overnight. What happens is that patch 1.1.1 [i]drastically[/i] changed the weapon balance, and the meta shifted to accommodate. ARs got crippled and lost the ability to dominate close-to-midrange fights. At first shotgun rushers expanded to fill the vacuum created by the imbalance. Then Bungie clamped down on special ammo to rein in the shotgunners. So now that their two primary nemeses have had their fangs pulled, hand cannons are now filling the vacuum. TLDR: Thorn isn't OP. The problem is 1.1.1 destroyed the balance at close-to-midrange and each nerf is making it worse and narrowing weapon variety. ARs need to be buffed back to their pre 1.1.1 damage levels. Personally I use whatever is competitive, and suits the situation and character I'm running. Which means I rotate between several different primaries. One time I'll be in your face with TLW. Others I'll mix it up with Bad Juju and Red Death. Others I'll be blowing your head off from long range with Mida and sniper rifles.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Look, I respect your opinion. But mine is not going to change. For a weapon to be OP, one does not look at the weapon alone. A weapon can only be OP in full context. Therefor you will have to take into account all weapons. Where you say: "Thorn is powerful and one of the best, most balanced performing weapons in the game right now, since ARs have been wiped from the field and pulse rifles are not reliable at close range." It sounds to me that that is what being OP means. If ARs would not have been wiped and had pulse rifles been reliable at close range, Thorn would not be OP. If for instance weapon A does a damage of 50 per second, and all other weapons deal 80 damage per second, weapon A is underpowered. However, if weapon A does that same damage of 50 per second, but all other weapons deal only 20 damage per second, weapon A is overpowered. Thorn being the same gun as it always was does not mean it isn't OP.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You are never going to achieve the sort of balance you want in this game. Not as long as it is part of a loot-based RPG. The best you will ever get is a big game of Rock/Paper/Scissors. Where each class of weapon dominates a particular range but will be outclassed outside of that range. Thorn is [i]not[/i] OP in the context of this kind of weapon system. A good SR user will destroy Thorn at long range. Shotguns and TLW at close range. Red Death, Bad Juju and Hawkmoon will own it at mid-range if you go about it intelligently. The problem in the Crucible right now isn't that HCs are suddenly OP. It's that 1.1.1 rendered ARs UP and Bungie had been trying to fix the damag with more nerds rather than the buff that is the real solution.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I remember the other day, I was hitting headshots 100% at long range with Mida, but Thorn beat me by miles. Scout rifles are supposed to win at that range, but they don't. You can't say I'm not good enough because I didn't miss. His time to kill was shorter so Thorn beat me at long range. This is why it's OP.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • His aim was also better. That's why he beat you. It's easier to headshot with Mida than with Thorn, and he was good enough to overcome the camera shake your shots were causing and return fire accurately in spite of it. Sometimes the other guy is just [i]better[/i] than you. No shame in that.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Boemkamer: 5/5/2015 6:49:53 PM
    I'm going to stop replying now though, because you are immune to logic apparently. Getting on my nerves a bit. I have checked your crucible record... Can't really take much of what you say seriously. Even more so when you keep contradicting yourself.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • My logic is fine I'm just challenging your views. Bottomline is I'm very familiar with both weapons. Part of the reason why Mida is so deadly is that it had almost no recoil and causes a LOT of camera shake it the player being headshotted. So it's difficult to return fire accurately. (In pve, the rounds [i]stagger[/i] enemies). If someone overcame that---which is hard to do with a hand cannon---to quickly two shot you in the head at long range.... He earned that win by just flat-out out playing you. Just tip your hat and say that you'll get em next time.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Still don't understand how you can't see that if truly 90% or so players use Thorn, that fact alone would mean it's OP. If you'd compare it to any other shooter, for instance call of duty, which most people are familiar with, if 90% of the players use one particular gun anyone would say it's OP. This game being loot based doesn't change that at all.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • ...and that's why you are the one who doesn't understand. The fact that the Crucible is part of a loot based RPG changes [i]everything[/i]...and makes any comparisons to CoD inappropriate. Because while pvp players want "balance", pve players want POWER. The power that will make them more effective against enemies that are overwhelming in number and power. The whole allure of a loot-based game is the appeal of going out and finding gear that makes your character more powerful. No pve player is going to grind for weeks for gear that isn't any better than what he already has. So this very fact will NEVER---as long as the pvp and pve weapon systems are connected---allow you to create (never mind, maintain) a system were all pvp weapons are equally powerful. Let's say for argument's sake, you nerf Thorn....and wind up with a perfectly balanced system. [i]What happens on the 19th when HoW drops?[/i]. When not only a bunch of brand new weapons with new powers get added to the game and get brought to the Crucible.... .... But by some indications we might even see entirely weapon [i]classes[/i]?? You'd have to nerf weapons forever, and wind up destroying the quality of pve chasing something you'll [i]never[/i] catch in this game on the pvp side.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Nah, almost no one is better than I am. Especially not aiming.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • ....and that's the root of your ultimate problem. No matter how good you are (or [i]think[/i] you are) there is always someone who's better. Even if it's just for that day, or that gunfight. Tiger Woods was one of the most dominant arhletes in the history of golf and of sports in general. Yet at the height of his career someone else was better 75% of the time. If your a hitter in the majors, if the other guy is better 70% of the time you'll be considered do the hall of fame. Don't kid yourself.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon