{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/4/2015 5:28:46 PM
1
There are millions of fossils that have been found over the years spanning 2.4 billion years of evolution. That number is widely agreed upon in science.
At the time of Darwin, this vast history of the earth was unknown. They did not have an idea because they did not have carbon dating yet. Today we do.
Did you take a Molecular Genetics class, Not about mendel and darwin but dealing with replication and mutations?
English
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/4/2015 5:34:08 PM[quote]There are millions of fossils that have been found over the years spanning 2.4 billion years of evolution.[/quote]Yet evolutionist can't find a set of over a million transitional forms for even one species.
-
A million forms for 1 species? Thats asking too much considering how many species there are and how rare it is for an organism to form a fossil
-
Even over millions of years, it should be more than abundant.
-
Why? Explain.
-
Millions to billions of years of life should have been more than enough time for the earth to possess at least one species (it doesn't have to be humans) with its fossilized transitional forms.
-
The chance of an animal making a fossil is too small to expect this
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/4/2015 9:06:37 PMYou know what's a smaller chance? The creation of life on a planet out of nothing without a cause, and all evolutionists love to preach that it has happened over millions to billions of years, but the number of fossils begs to disagree, even if producing a fossil is a small chance.
-
I dont think the number of fossils disagrees
-
[quote]I dont [b]think[/b] the number of fossils disagrees.[/quote]It is not dependent on what you think but on what you know to be true and evident.
