{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/4/2015 3:14:08 PM
2
-
You don't need a counter argument for something proven.
-
Translation: "I have none." My response:[spoiler]Okay.[/spoiler]
-
You assume anything outside of your belief is false as every post below shows.
-
No, I assume anything illogical is false.
-
Thats not true, you beliefs obviously demonstrate that lol
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/5/2015 5:50:43 AMMy beliefs are grounded through reason. You yourself can't provide a counter argument to the thinking. Not so LOL.
-
They are not grounded in reason any counter argument against you that i have read proves otherwise. You are close minded and don't take into consideration what others say.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/5/2015 6:10:29 AMI take everything that everyone wishes to state on this post. I started the forum. Of course I try to acknowledge every one individual comment. You in particular have a nasty habit of not accepting why I believe as something that is supportive to my faith, and you indulge in trading the comments that I have stated toward others and making it personal to yourself. I frankly wish that you would stay out of every A and B conversion so that you would C your way out of it. I don't care if you think that you yourself are informative. Informative people are useless without open-mindedness of context. What I detest are the types of attitudes people possess when they automatically put themselves on a higher pedestal because of their acclaimed knowledge on the semantics of any particular topic under the stupid guise of pride. If you don't like the subject, avoid it. If you are going to debate, keep an open mind, and if you continue to proceed attacking my character, reduce your stupidity by providing a logical rebuttal. This is in the "Off Topic" section; so treat it as something that everyone expects you to treat it as, it's bloody "Off Topic."
-
there isnt one. evolution is a fact. period.
-
Under what basis?
-
on the basis that we know evolution happens.
-
We know evolution causes variations of the [b]same[/b] species. So, is there any macro-evolutionary evidence?
-
evolution is evolution. the macro vs micro debate is fabricated by evolution deniers like you in an effort to discredit it.
-
Translation: "I don't have one."
-
because one isnt needed. we know evolution is real, so there is no "but" needed.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/4/2015 6:50:15 PM..."but" where can I find an explanation to the origin of organic life manifesting from non-organic material. Help me You-Smart-One-Kenobi; your my only hope. :)
-
somewehre outside of evolution, because evolution does not cover the origin of life.
-
[quote]...evolution does not cover the origin of life.[/quote]I rest my case.
-
do you also want me to use evolution to explain how chemicals interact with each other? or what friction is? you cant use evolution to explain something it doesnt deal with.
-
Then use another subject grounded in the reasoning, Chemistry and Biology. Feel free to provide me with logical steps of reasoning so that I can conclude that evolution is true.
-
the biological proof behind evolution is already there. this video is a good example.
-
[quote][quote]...evolution does not cover the origin of life.[/quote]I rest my case.[/quote] Haha I can never take you seriously. XD
-
