Interesting video, and I understand how he acknowledges religion, but some of his reasoning is honestly wrong. Firstly, he obviously has no substantiation or credibility for what he says, and he quotes that what he has been saying is not intended to be used to change your mind even when he admittedly stated that he wasn't going to use opposing sources that are intended to rebuttal specific views; therefore, he makes all other further statements bias. Secondly, he appears not to be leaning toward a specific view. So, what, no conclusion? Lastly (I could mention more), not that I agree with him, but some of what he stated is actually biblical, yet he refrains, admittedly, from using any scripture.