{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by SSG ACM:
5/7/2015 5:17:40 AM
1
No, it's easy to understand. Understanding it is determined by how long one decides to sit his butt in the chair and study, and in my studies, I've found that:
(1) Evolution has no explanation to its own origin of organic life.
(2) Charles Darwin has doubt to his own "theory" ([i]On the Origin of Species[/i], Chapter 6).
(3) There is no evolutionary explanation to the origin of intelligence.
(4) Evidence for micro-evolution (e.g., dogs and wolves, cats and lions, yet are still Canis and Felines) exists.
(5) Evidence for macro-evolution (e.g., fish to reptiles, dinosaurs to chickens, monkeys to humans, etc) doesn't exists. Only speculated info from matching look-a-likes and slightly different chromosome counts.
English
-
[quote]No, it's easy to understand. Understanding it is determined by how long one decides to sit his butt in the chair and study, and in my studies, I've found that: (1) Evolution has no explanation to its own origin of organic life. (2) Charles Darwin has doubt to his own "theory" ([i]On the Origin of Species[/i], Chapter) (3) There is no evolutionary explanation to the origin of intelligence. (4) Evidence for micro-evolution (e.g., dogs and wolves, cats and lions, yet are still Canis and Felines) exists. (5) Evidence for macro-evolution (e.g., fish to reptiles, dinosaurs to chickens, monkeys to humans, etc). Only speculated info from matching look-a-likes.[/quote] I already responded to that. It's basically all irrelevant to whether or not evolution is true.
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/4/2015 7:12:37 PM[quote]I already responded to that. [b]It's [/b]basically all [b]irrelevant to whether or not evolution is true.[/b][/quote]Is there something wrong with this statement?
-
What is wrong with it?
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/5/2015 1:50:33 AMRead the bold. If you meant it on purpose, I can only assume you are Deistic.
-
Edited by IamPluto: 5/5/2015 3:16:46 AMIdk how you can assume that from what I said. Anyway no. I consider myself an Agnostic Atheist. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnostic_atheism
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/6/2015 6:38:55 AMSin (1): You used Wikipedia. Sin (2): You stated, "It's basically all irrelevant to whether or not evolution is true." Why? That's so neutral.
-
1 - we are not writing a research paper in college. We are on a video game forum. It's no big deal 2 - no it's not neutral. What you said has nothing to do with evolution being true. And I already told you why
-
Okay. I'll respect your privy.
