[quote] Evolution is contrary to natural laws (without exception) whereas creation is consistent with natural laws—for example, creation is consistent with the laws of thermodynamics and law of biogenesis. [/quote] The creationist argument is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of thermodynamics and the Second Law. The laws of thermodynamics only apply within a thermodynamically "closed" system, in which no free energy can enter from outside the system. Under such circumstances, the available free energy is used up and degraded until it can no longer do work, leading to thermodynamic decay and increase in entropy and disorder. The Earth is not a closed system. [quote], There are no transitional fossils or living forms—there is not one single example of evolution! Evolutionists look for “the” missing link—ironically, they are in desperate search for just one! But there should be billions of examples of transitional forms with transitional structures if evolution were true, but there are none. The bottom line, evolution has never been observed within fossils or living populations. [/quote] There are literally hundreds of transitional fossils – ones that show features in common with distinct later species. I like Tiktaalik  the best, an ugly brute with some fishy gills, land-lubbing lungs, and some bits that were in between (a wrist joint connecting to fins).  http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiktaalik Here you can see for yourself. Also you say evolution has never been observed. How could it? Evolution is a process that takes thousands of years in the least. We've been studying evolution for 150 years. Creation has had 2000 years to supply one viable source of proof, and it hasn't. Furthermore, finding true transition fossils is difficult because organisms only fossilize under certain circumstances. Not every organism becomes a fossil.