{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by SSG ACM:
5/2/2015 2:46:06 PM
1
[quote][quote]We all know that it is by "Natural Selection" that we as biological organisms "evolve" very slowly quench mutations one genetic step at a time. Then what? What in this bloody world could have ever jump started our existence in the first place?[/quote]
[b]you're blending two fields of study again.[/b][/quote]You still haven't answered this question.
English
-
That's because the beginning of life, abiogenesis, is a field that doesn't have a scientific theory to answer that yet.
-
[quote]That's because...abiogenesis...doesn't have a scientific theory to answer that yet.[/quote]Let me know when there is an explanation.
-
I will, they've made some amazing discoveries already. http://news.sciencemag.org/biology/2015/03/researchers-may-have-solved-origin-life-conundrum
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/4/2015 7:26:18 PM"Researches may have solved..." I'm just gonna put that out there, and also point out that it stated, "Chemists report today that a pair of simple compounds, which would have been abundant on early Earth, can give rise to a network of simple reactions that produce the three major classes of biomolecules—nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids—needed for the earliest form of life to get its start," yet there's no explanation as to the origin or carbon, which is number one element used to distinguish between organic and inorganic. Do you know what determines the substance's element? The number of protons that that element possesses, and we know even today, that that has never happened naturally.
