JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

4/30/2015 3:53:26 AM
3
Really?! None of the DNA extracted from some of said fossils is proof of relation to current creatures?
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • ~~~ **Bubble Pooping**~~~ Pop~!

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Like?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Sorry, i was sleeping LOL, but what about the small insects found in Amber, scientists extracted DNA from them because the amber preserved them extraordinarily well. The testing showed relation to modern day insects.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • What about them? Are they still not insects? The Darwinism mechanism has never been shown to be capable of creating new genetic information or new complex body parts such as wings, eyes, or brains. Without a mechanism that can be demonstrated to be capable of the necessary creation, the theory of evolution is just a fantasy with no real scientific basis. So something was preserved in an organism that can be observed with modern insects. Is that not expected as much as one would suppose? I do intend to find similarities among those that were and that which is known as "the modern living" generation that are still exhibiting those similar traits.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Just because there is relation, doesn't make evolution. That relation shows that there was ONE creator.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • No, no it doesn't.. Humans are related to apes and bonobos, we are not related to whales however. We share common ancestry with apes, we do not come from apes

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Did i say we are related to whales? Don't think so!

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Actually, if you looked into it, you'd find that we are related to a multitude of things. We are related to whales, as we are fellow mammals. We are even related to corn.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Are you arguing with me or him because I didn't date anything I'm just quoting a guy who knows a lot more about fossil than either me or you do.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Tbh I didn't realize you weren't the guy who posted the original comment LOL

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Haha but to be honest though the fossil record doesn't show any transitional species I have quite a few more cited quotes from a research paper I did a while back even from evolutionist standpoint.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon