{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/21/2015 12:27:07 AM
5
I'm playing on a 46" Samsung LED. It's bottom in it's class in price, but top of it's class in lowest input lag. It's 1080p@60Hz. I make sure to shut off any hardware image processing features of the TV by using PC mode. I don't see any reason to go 4k, as current gen consoles don't support it. I wouldn't use a Plasma TV for gaming, as they are known to "burn in" images when playing video games.
English
-
Plasma is the best speaking strictly from a graphical/low ms delay standpoint. I had a plasma for years and never had any burn in issues. Bought a new LCD and my BF4 stats tanked for awhile because the delay was way worse on the LCD. Took some getting used to.
-
Edited by jnikoley: 3/21/2015 5:05:24 AMInput lag will be bad on any full featured TV. That's why I went bare bones. Mine only goes up to 120hz, but I have that turned off. The 240, and higher Hz TVs are really bad for lag. I think mine is 6ms response time, and 28ms for input lag, not great, but good for a TV.
-
That's more the older plasma's, the newer ones are much safer for gaming now. Nearly on par with lcds. In saying that tho I've played on both and I prefer lcd over plasma
-
I agree but i have a plasma lg and so far the only lcd that compare to it are expensive tjey both have tjere pros and cons like plasma has really rich dark colors which i prefer for gaming lcd dark colors are a lil bland to me but its who ever choice i guess. And yea that older plasma tjat burn in mine was on for a good hr or so and no burn in 8)
-
Yeah, image retention is less of a concern on newer plasmas, but it can occur, just not as quickly, or severely as the early plasmas. I also prefer lcd.
