It's simple: if a fact is something that is indisputably true, no scientific theory, even if it is true, can be case. This is because scientific theories are by their definition testable and falsifiable. They can be built upon and changed. If it is not falsifiable, it isn't a scientific theory. Even if evolution or gravity are never disproven, the possibility still exists. And as such, they are disputable, and therefore not facts.
If the original statement was "it's not even a debate, evolution governs the development of life", I would have less of a problem with it. It would be even better of it was "it's not even a debate, evolution is the single best explanation we have on the origins of life", but that isn't nearly as simple a statement.
Your role as a moderator enables you immediately ban this user from messaging (bypassing the report queue) if you select a punishment.
7 Day Ban
7 Day Ban
30 Day Ban
Permanent Ban
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
This site uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
close
Our policies have recently changed. By clicking 'Accept', you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
Accept
Our policies have recently changed. By continuing to use this site, you agree to the updated policies documented at Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.