First, GJ at kind of necro-bumping my post... Second, read the rest of the thread b4 you post something that others have posted. Third, irreducible complexity. You imply that micro-evolution leads to more complex (or more evolved) species, but that cannot explain certain species that cannot have existed or formed with less complexity (see my bombardier beetle post below). Fourth, micro-evolutionary adaptions are not permanent. On the Galapagos Isles, during the drought, the birds adapted for sharper beaks to pierce through tough shells of nuts and seeds, but once the rains started and food was plentiful, they adapted back to more round beaks for eating berries. Fifth, just because something is logical, does not mean it is true. You need proof to back up a statement. The gaps in the fossil record are too large to even hint at evolution between species, and drawings don't actually count. Finally, whether or not you actually read what I posted, I'm not going to debate this anymore. This post is put to rest.