I know how evolution works ..... Even the people who wrote about it and discovered it found holes in their theories and have contradicted themselves and even came out with other statements that disproved their first statements .... Hawking, Darwin etc ... Darwin proposed a theory, but he has two entire chapters that state the evidence his theory required that was missing. He assumed the evidence would be there some time in the future. At this writing, it is 2010, over one hundred and fifty years later. If the evidence to support Charles Darwin’s theory was going to be found, it would have been found by now. Evolutionists are always looking for evidence to support their faith in evolution. Some even go so far as to make fraudulent proof for evolution. See my website page: Evolution Frauds. As I say on that page, if there was real evidence, fraudulent evidence would not be needed. This book is promoted as the bible for evolution but it actually has evidence against evolution. Quote by Darwin: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.” If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory to descent with slow modification though natural selection.

[quote]I know how evolution works. [b]your comments show you dont[/b] Even the people who wrote about it and discovered it found holes in their theories and have contradicted themselves and even came out with other statements that disproved their first statements .... Hawking, Darwin etc ... [b]because that's how science works, as new information is discovered, it is added.[/b] Darwin proposed a theory, but he has two entire chapters that state the evidence his theory required that was missing. He assumed the evidence would be there some time in the future. At this writing, it is 2010, over one hundred and fifty years later. If the evidence to support Charles Darwin’s theory was going to be found, [b](its been found for a long time, Darwin just put the pieces together.)[/b] it would have been found by now. Evolutionists are always looking for evidence to support their faith in evolution. [b]All of biology, molecular biology, paleontology, pretty much all the natural sciences do, and continue to support evolution. Just because you haven't seen what you incorrectly think evolution is doesn't discredit what it actually is.[/b] Some even go so far as to make fraudulent proof for evolution. See my website page: Evolution Frauds. As I say on that page, if there was real evidence, fraudulent evidence would not be needed. [b]so transitional forms in the fossil record are just nothing? Documented changes in modern times is just coincidence?[/b] This book is promoted as the bible for evolution but it actually has evidence against evolution. [b]no its promoted as the base model for how life changes[/b] Quote by Darwin: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.” [b]so because Darwin asked questions, its false? You're an idiot.[/b] If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory to descent with slow modification though natural selection. [b]I don't even know what you're saying here. All the numerous genus and species didn't start into life all at once, they came at different points from their ancestors. [/b] [/quote] Evolution doesn't live and die with Darwin. Its has so much evidence outside of him proposing it. Its not like the bible, its not something that he said and is now just accepted. Its heavily investigated, and constantly being refined.

What im showing in that reply is that your evolutionists and writers .... Atheists .... They all contradict themselves and discredit themselves by saying their own theories were wrong later. They can't and you can't prove the bible to be wrong, or anything Jesus has done wasnt real .... But your so called theorists can be and HAVE been proven wrong.