You are stating a hypothesis though, not a conclusion. [quote]macro evolution is a bigger change but it is over millions of years, so the adaptions add up into bigger changes over time.[/quote] Like I said, there is no solid, non-disputable evidence that proves this claim. If we look to the past for proof, we run into multiple issues. One of them is irreducible complexity. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombardier_beetle This beetle works like an explosive, directing flamethrower to ward off predators. I have to ask, how could evolution, or rather, the beetle itself design this deadly defense in parts? If it had any design flaw, it would simply explode when it mixed the chemicals, and you can't pass on information to the future if you are a smoldering husk. We can assume the beetle got lucky, calculating all the variables and possible faults then putting it together with assistants finally trying it out. Now, we return to the fact that it is just a beetle, and I doubt that it even knows how its own body is made up internally. The other option is looking to the future. Saying, "this is true, but we can't tell you why until later in the future," is a fallacy. Without evidence, there is no conclusion. I know I won't change your mind, but at least I can make you think and question what you were told.