What about the huge gaps in the fossil record? There are an extremely small amount of transitional forms to be found in the fossil record (i.e. A fossil of a horse transitioning into a giraffe) and even those few forms are highly debatable, such as the [i]Archaeopteryx[/i]. Also the fact that a horse in more biologically similar in its DNA to a bacterium (approx. 36%) while a cell of yeast is only 31% similar to a bacterium doesn't make any sense. Also, research the Cambrian Exposion and what Richard Dawkins says about it. My case, that the currently accepted form of macroevolution is stupid and still in hypothesis stage.