{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/9/2015 10:54:14 PM
6
What about the huge gaps in the fossil record? There are an extremely small amount of transitional forms to be found in the fossil record (i.e. A fossil of a horse transitioning into a giraffe) and even those few forms are highly debatable, such as the [i]Archaeopteryx[/i]. Also the fact that a horse in more biologically similar in its DNA to a bacterium (approx. 36%) while a cell of yeast is only 31% similar to a bacterium doesn't make any sense. Also, research the Cambrian Exposion and what Richard Dawkins says about it.
My case, that the currently accepted form of macroevolution is stupid and still in hypothesis stage.
English
-
The only huge gap is.. [spoiler][b]IS YOUR MOMS PU$$Y[/b][/spoiler]
-
No pls no buly u make cri :'(
-
2 l8, m8
-
Do you have any degrees in evolutionary biology?
-
*ignores millions of species catalogued in fossil record, instead focuses on the ones that we haven't found yet You realize that as of now, we've discovered 1% of the species on the earth alive right now, right?
-
The fact that some transitional fossils are not preserved does not disprove evolution. Evolutionary biologists do not expect that all transitional forms will be found and realize that many species leave no fossils at all. Lots of organisms don't fossilize well and the environmental conditions for forming good fossils are not that common. So, science actually predicts that for many evolutionary changes there will be gaps in the record. Also, scientists have found many transitional fossils. For example, there are fossils of transitional organisms between modern birds and their theropod dinosaur ancestors, and between whales and their terrestrial mammal ancestors.
