Oh you right about that. The kid got what he deserved BUT does not deserve any hate or love for it. He screwed up, no need to punish him any more or to reward him for screwing up Kirmit on the other hand should be punished. He took advantage of someone (regardless of who it was). In fact, all I hear is about this kid, what about all the others that kirmit has wronged? Nobody cared about those... Punish kirmit for them too. This was BAD, mmmkay? And as for shareplay... its not useful to me but that doesnt mean it should be removed. Or at least it shouldnt be removed because some guys are tricking others into misusing it. Remember that Kirmit's deeds are nothing compared to what people already do in facebook and emails with phishing scams and stalking and bullying. You dont like it, fine... neither do I. You dont use it, fine... i cant find any use for it as well. You want it removed, thats ok, doesnt bother me. Remove it because some kid was tricked... uh no. Thats a bad precedent. Real life example: ps3's unix feature-> removed because it could be used to hack/exploit/pirate games with it. Look at the amount of people that complained (most of them never had used it nor cared about it). Because someone was misusing it some people had to stop using it (and there was some legitimate users, including the US that was using ps3s to build a super computer) [url=https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100513/0113129410.shtml]Link to PS3 and Air Force super computer problem[/url]