My favorite historical bell(s) are The Bells of Uglich... aka The Exiled Bells... ⚠️[b][A History Topic] - specifically the significance and symbolism of the above Bells.[/b]⚠️ [url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/Exiled_bells_of_Uglich_in_Tobolsk_1885.png]aka The Bells of Regret [/url] 🤓 Their ringing marked an infamous time in history known as the [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_of_Troubles]Time of Troubles.[/url] The assassination of the Romanovs. One marker whereby inconsistency in the record seem to indicate for a collaborative effort to change and revise history. [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Sh8V_c6sW0]The Romanov Family Tree Has a 200-Year Gap — The Missing Branch Leads to Tartaria[/url] Going all the way back to the origins of Christianity, I'm speaking historically... Vatican 1 and schism between the eastern orthodox church and Catholicism. What I was taught... was that it was about the ministry. Marketing to faithful. Building churches... investments, spending tithe on things like art. It was still probably about that. The eastern orthodox interpreted the vow of poverty differently than the Catholic clergy did. And for that reason... they split. ⚠️Note: I'm NOT talking about scripture, mysticisms, or doctrine of any religion. I'm AM talking about historical events that include institutions and power structures of those time periods relative to those historical events, i.e. the Time of Trouble and the artifact, i.e. Bells of Regret. So, that there's no confusion... I'm talking about history⚠️. Marketing? What if it was about more than that? That's the conspiracy. The Romanov family were scions/psions of the Eastern Orthodox church. And the idea is that those conflicts and the assassination of the Romanov family were engineered, shadow brokered, warmongered to hide the fact that history has been manipulated. That the Romanovs held the secrets and could prove it; that the "Marketing" that precipitated the schism was more than... about murals, sculptures, and building churches. It was about editing history. As in the west throughout antiquity, the clergy were the primary scribes of our recorded history. Juicy... huh? What are your thoughts? To add: I'm not really a conspiracy person... I haven't looked into it that deep, but from what I gather... The church has (the conspiracy idea, not a declaration) literally "literally" removed hundreds of years from our collective consciousness to serve their motives... ambitions of the elite and powerful even beyond the church. Compressed time as transcribed in the record, moved other things around to change the order per their design. I mean they did do that with the bible... literally "literally". I'm still not a conspiracy guy though. Here's another "supposed" marker for the idea/conspiracy history was edited. [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonius_of_Tyana]Apollonius of Tyana[/url] c. 3 BC – c. AD 97 Remind you of anyone important?